
Book review by Greyfox
[with interruptions, interference, and kibitzing by KaiOaty]
Prefactory Note and Apologia: I must beg
the indulgence of you, the gentle reader, for I will be going the long
way around the barn before getting to the gist of the titular subject
matter. At first blush, this may seem irrelevant, but I think not,
being that all things are connected. Now that I have duly given notice
that this may be a longish and rambly piece, here goes.
First of all, the title is the title of a book written by Esther and Jerry Hicks. I
found it recently whilst browsing the new books shelf at the local
library, something I do several times a week. The authors are evidently
two more famous people I have never heard of–the blurb says that they
are “New York Times best-selling authors,” and that they have an
“internationally acclaimed ” website. I must have missed the acclaim.
Anyway, it has a preface by Neale Donald Walsch, one of the preeminent
names in spirituality these days, author of the CWG series, and a major
influence on my own spiritual growth. Now Neale has a tendency to get
enthused to the point of hysteria sometimes (he is far from alone in
this, I hasten to add, having done it myself), but he really outdid
himself this time. He says to “put all the other books down. . . . this
is it: everything you need to know about life and how to make it work.”
Gee, Neale, does that mean I can stop re-reading your books? Does that
mean I can throw away all my books by Deepak Chopra, and my Bibles and
the Teachings of the Buddha? Somehow I doubt that.
I decided to give Neale the benefit of the doubt and plow on. The first
twenty pages were basically filler, in which I learned way more about
the authors than I really wanted to, especially all the gushy stuff
about how happy and fulfilled they are and how much dough they’re
making. I mean I’m happy for them and all, but really. Then I found out
the the law and all comes from “Abraham,” a collective name for a group
of entities the authors channel by using a Ouija board. Ooo-kay.
Then I got to the part where Esther talks about how she was spelling out
letters of the alphabet in the air with her nose. At that point I
thought–in my highly evolved and spiritual way–”FUCK THIS SHIT,” and
put the book back on the shelf.
Then I went to use the free phone at the library to call my sweety, and
told her about this book. Now she is more woo-woo than I am, and so is
more comfy with channeled stuff than I am, a major influence on her
having been The Urantia Book, one of the most impressive (I think)
channeled works ever. Plus, she does not share my antipathy towards Ouija, mainly because she is less sensitive to entities than I am [AHEM! KaiOaty here. "Less sensitive"? I don't think so. Less fearful and more in control of my own consciousness, I'd say.], and
has had way less [traumatic, negative] experience with them. But in the course of our
conversation, she mentioned that her favorite Tarot deck had been
channeled through Ouija, and urged me to give the book a read. So I did.
It was rough going for me. The format was Q and A, which seemed to be
lifted from CWG. The language itself was your basic channel-speak–dry,
lofty, and impersonal–which I find very off-putting. Many of the
sentences were so much so, I had to read them several times and sort of
translate them into more accessible English. Many of the key phrases
had that little (TM) after them, meaning that the authors had
trade-marked stuff like “The Science of Deliberate Creation” (TM) and
the “Art of Allowing” (TM). Personally, I find this sort of promiscuous
trade-marking to be fear-based, pretentious, and just plain irritating [And KaiOaty would put it even more strongly than that!] ,
but I persevered.
FINALLY–here it is: the Law of Attraction: “That which is like unto
itself, is drawn.” Even allowing for the fact that it is channeled
stuff, that seems wildly ungrammatical and garbled. In more coherent
terms, I think it means “Like attracts like.” There is nothing new
about this–and I suspect the authors cobbled the book together in a
big hurry to jump on the bandwagon that “The Secret” started–not that
there is anything wrong with that. This is pretty much the same as the
medieval doctrine of signatures, and the basis for sympathetic magick.
To put it another way, what you think about is what you get. [Seek and ye shall find.] Again,
nothing new about this. Many of us have been saying that we create our
own reality through thought, word, and deed, but this book grabs that
idea and runs like hell with it. However, it DOES clarify the idea that
we attract what we fear, and push away what we desire. (HUH?!?!?) Let
me try to elucidate.
Basically, what you think about is what you attract, whether you desire
it or not. Focus your thoughts on getting something that you fear or
dread, and ta da!–here it comes. And often, when you desire something,
you don’t so much focus your thoughts on the getting of it as on your
present LACK of it–and so the LACK of it continues to manifest.
So for me–and I have been racking up numerous examples of its working–the concept is valid–not to say bordering on spooky.
One reason, BTW, I stressed so highly my own doubts and misgivings about
the book itself was not so much to make fun of it as to reveal my own
shortcomings. I am far from shy about sharing my strengths–so it seems
only fair to reveal a weakness. That is, my own biases almost kept me
from what was really a useful and valuable book–even if it ain’t
exactly a page-turner.
Recent Comments