June 20, 2008

  • Tarot and Esoteric Initiation

    Esoteric:

    designed for
    or understood by the specially initiated alone [1]

    Arcane:

    known or knowable only to the initiate
    [2]

    Occult:

    not revealed; not easily apprehended or
    understood; hidden from view [3]

    Initiate:

    a person who is undergoing or has
    undergone an initiation; a person who is instructed or adept in some
    special field [4]

    The
    exoteric, out-in-the-open, non-secret use or purpose for Tarot cards is
    for divination.  They work quite well for that purpose, and
    even in the hands of a novice can produce readings that are impressive
    in their accuracy.

    Divination is considered by some
    to be a low and profane use of the Tarot.  The higher use, the
    sacred purpose, of the symbolic system embodied in the Tarot is
    initiation.  The 22 Major Arcana of the Tarot are believed to
    have originated as murals painted in a Hall of Initiation in ancient
    Egypt, to serve as guides along the initiates’
    path.

    I intend, in a series of posts here, to
    symbolically, metaphorically, walk the initiate’s path.  Come
    with me if you will.  The deck I will be using throughout is
    the I Am One Tarot, Maya Britan’s rendering of the progressed
    symbolism channeled in the 1960s by John Cook, first painted by Rosalind
    Sharpe, and originally published as The Book of T: New Tarot for the
    Aquarian Age
    .

    I will also show examples of other
    decks which use the old symbolism, for contrast, and we can discuss how
    the symbolism has evolved as we move from Pisces into Aquarius. 
    We can discuss any aspects of Tarot and/or initiation that you’d care to bring up. 

    The starting point, entry upon the
    path:


    Arcanum 0 or 22:  The
    Fool

    For some he has no number, because
    he is the beginning and the end.  Others assign #1 to
    him, and still others number him #22.  In my deck, he wears
    nothing, and all he carries are a bunch of scrolls, one of them opened
    and partially read, the others untouched, still to be
    revealed.  Under a brilliant sun, he moves from a barren area
    of rocks, into a field of growing, blossoming flowers, with the spider
    of intuition overhead, guiding him, “spinning the web of
    destiny.”

    In older
    decks, he was called The Fool, and he was often dressed as a
    jester.  My first Tarot deck, in 1969, was the Marseilles
    deck, above.  [For an informative article tracing origins of
    the various versions of that deck, see Hunting the "true" Marseilles
    Tarot
    by Robert Mealing.]   Le
    Fou, I learned back then, was a heedless, clueless innocent, driven by his passions and baser
    instincts, as symbolized by the animal biting him in the butt
    there.  Some artists render it as a cat, some as a dog, and
    others in various ways.  The authors of The Book of T gave the
    animal two heads, dog and cat, and set it quietly in the foreground, no
    longer driving us, but keeping us company and making life
    interesting.

    Below is the Fool from Aleister
    Crowley’s Thoth Tarot.  Let me know if you’d like to discuss
    the Fool further before we move on to the Magus.  I’m in no
    hurry, and it might be fun to compare the ways different artists and
    initiates view the Arcana.  What is your favorite
    deck?  If it isn’t the Rider-Waite, can you find images from
    it online, or scan some in?

Comments (23)

  • I love Tarot. I have two decks myself. I like the way that each artist has their own take on the symbols. There are some decks that just blow me away. Great post.

  • Gotta Love the fool.  The fool shows up everytime I start a new project, like a centinel to remind me to let it be what it is.  I have Aquarian Tarot and Morgan’s Tarot.  The Morgan’s come in black and white so over the year sI have colored some of them in and left others as is.  Like a work in progress such as I am.

  • I always felt that the Fool represents the question of where am I going ? Don’t look back just go forward and you will still land on your feet.

    Does that make sense ? Or maybe I am just too tired.

    ~P~

  • While it would probably make all the polite Odinists shudder, I love the Tarot. Two of my favourite decks are The Marseilles (my first deck) and Crowley’s Thoth. I am a big fan of the Thoth deck and I could stare holes through the artwork all day long.

  • I usually use the Robin Wood tarot, a version that sticks pretty closely to the Rider-Waite imagery but with a Neo-Pagan cast to the symbolism. But the deck I’m most enthusiastic about is the PoMo tarot, now sadly out of print. There are a couple of images at http://www.telp.com/tarot/pomo.htm and more at http://www.aeclectic.net/tarot/cards/pomo/ … I tried to insert links but copy/paste is disabled.

    I’ll cheerfully scan the PoMo fool (named The Idiot in this deck) but I probably won’t have a chance to before Sunday.

  • Oh how I need a new reading… soon my friend soon

  • a friend just gave me a russian, st. petersburg deck this week:
    the fool

  • Awesome–you raise the bar still higher!

  • @WiseOrFool - The ones that blow you away–which decks, how and why?

    @Jaynebug - Is your “Aquarian” deck the one with flowing stylized pastel images? I had several of them as posters on my walls in the ‘seventies. I have left my Morgan deck uncolored, and also another b&w deck, Egyptian. I haven’t used either of them much.

    @poescrow - I think that makes a lot of sense as a divinatory interpretation of The Fool, and more so in some decks than in others. Esoterically, he is somewhat of a tabula rasa, or as blank as we may get:  open, ready, seeking.

    @that_friggan_knitter - When Greyfox and I met, we discovered that the Thoth deck was the only one that both of us had in our collections. His connection to Crowley is stronger than mine, but I have spent many hours studying his imagery, and trying to grasp his reordering of the trumps. Do you (anyone, please feel free to jump in here, too) have any thoughts about that rearrangement?

    @Scriveling - 
    The Robin Wood Tarot is the deck Greyfox uses most. I like it for aesthetic reasons; it just looks good to me, takes those “traditional” (to Gardnerians) images and pretties them up. PoMo links: telp.com and aeclectic.net. I found and saved 5 trumps, but no Fool. You’ll have time to scan him Sunday, because I don’t expect to get back on this trail before then. I’d like to see the entire deck to get a feel for how the artist views the Path.

    @satori - I like that rendering. I’ll post it in the next installment. His little dog is curled up around his feet, could trip him, but not maliciously. He has a puppet of himself on his left hand, and it looks like a toy in his right, just playing around, unaware that he is in control. What or who is the brown figure he’s dancing on — Mother Earth?

    Everyone:
    I have more than enough material to make at least one more post on The Fool. Your input is welcome and appreciated. I requested and received permission from the artist(s) to use images from the unique Fantastic Menagerie deck, too.

  • here

    @SuSu - 

    ‘s the fool from the deck that I very much want: Salvador Dali

  • @satori - I’m glad you found that. Thanks. I looked yesterday and found only his Hierophant, Death, and Justice. I want that deck, too. I have the book for it, but the last time I checked, the cards were $75.00 — too pricey for me, and they could have gone up since then.

  • @SuSu - ”Is your “Aquarian” deck the one with flowing stylized pastel images?”

      Yes, It has the Fool on the front holding a flower in his right hand along with his staff. I got mine in the seventies. My Morgan’s came to life when I threw in some color energy. 

  • Although I’ve been out there and back on Tarot decks and own 15-20 of them, I’ve returned to the Waite deck in recent years. I mostly do one card advice readings for myself–questions like “What should I keep in mind today” or “What’s the best way for me to approach this problem.” Sometimes I have trouble applying card to the question I’ve asked, but when I do understand the answer, the deck has never steered me in the wrong direction. I have a healthy respect for the accuracy of Tarot. Among modern decks, I find James Wanless’s Voyager deck impressive for it’s depth of symbolism and enjoy the beauty of the images in the Rohrig Tarot. The sensuality of the Cosmic Tribe deck also appeals to me. The Osho Zen deck is unique in it’s approach.

    The Fool is both the alpha and the omega, the enlightened person who cheerfully admits to knowing nothing. “Beginner’s Mind” as Suzuki said. In order to step off the cliff of material existence, one must be free of preconceptions and willing to surrender to one’s fate without fear or concern for individual preservation. Trusting the Universe that much is both wise and naive.

    I don’t know how to move an image onto this page, but I’ll scan The Fool from the Rohrig deck and post it in my blog for anyone who may be interested.

  • @Jaynebug - Color is something I’ve been thinking about since I went searching the web for “Fool” images. I know that changing the colors changes the meaning and the feeling one gets from the pictures. Many contemporary artists seem to ignore the symbolic associations with colors, and paint their cards with only aesthetics in mind — unless they are intentionally altering the cards’ meanings. Any thoughts on that?

  • I forgot to add Medicine Cards and Zen Tarot to my list of decks.  Do you know of the Medicine cards by Jamie Sams and David Carson?

  • @SuSu - I do know that when I applied color I let the colors pick themselves.  No questions asked.  I like to do art that way myself so it just seemed natural to me.  When my art students ask about what colors to use I flash many in front of them and tell them it’s their choice.  When they insist that I pick or advise I flash many colors again telling them all the many ideas that they can allow for their colors choice.  Does it lift you? Does it need darkness.  What do you feel about the colors.  In this way they can start to “feel” the draw within themselves.  Have you read ‘Understanding Your Life Through Color’ by Nancy Ann?  I got her book after an amazing experience with aura photography.  Very interesting read.  Have a great day Kathy. 

  • @MsCatbert2You - OMG!  When you said, “soon,” did you mean you wanted a reading soon, or that you’d get back to me soon with questions, or what?

    I must have seen your comment at the time, but it just popped up again as I was going back through looking for something else.

  • Recent times when internet has so much gossiping and stuff, your content really refreshes me.
    psychic reading methods

  • I guess this message is totally unparalleled.
    psychic reading online free

  • <table border=”0″ cellpadding=”0″ cellspacing=”0″ width=”528″><tbody><tr height=”20″>
    <td height=”20″ width=”528″>I would surely give
    10 on 10 for such incredible content.
    <table border=”0″ cellpadding=”0″ cellspacing=”0″ width=”819″><tbody><tr height=”20″>
    <td height=”20″ width=”819″><a
    href=”http://www.psychicreviewonline.com/psychic-reviews/california-psychics-review.php”>
    psychic reading 5 free minutes

  • psychic reading for love
    Your site is for sure worth bookmarking.

  • Keep it up; keep posting more n more n more. http://www.alissamonroe.com

Post a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *